Latest Post

Chinese vice premier arrives on three-day visit Weight competing Gulf interests in terminal deal

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday admitted the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and federal government’s intra-court docket appeals against a ruling of its unmarried bench concerning the keeping of nearby our bodies polls within the federal capital on December 31.

A -member bench of the IHC, headed by means of Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, fixed January nine for hearing the Centre and the Election Commission of Pakistan.The courtroom issued notices to the PTI and Jamaat-e-Islami for January nine. However, the IHC rejected the ECP and the authorities’s plea to droop the single bench’s verdict at the identical day (the day past) and also issued be aware on stay utility.

A -member bench comprising Chief Justice Amir Farooq and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz heard the appeals on Monday.

The ECP’s lawyer argued that the unmarried bench had no longer taken the high courtroom’s choice into attention upon which the court docket inquired what had took place when the problem become sent to the electoral watchdog.

The attorney informed the courtroom that the ECP had ordered the postponement of nearby frame elections in the federal capital on December 27 and that the decision issued with the aid of the election regulatory body on December 28 become not challenged, including that “the verdict became final”.

The ECP director standard of regulation additionally apprised the courtroom that on December 28, the electoral regulatory frame had decided to delay the polls and that the selection became primarily based at the December 27 order.”The reasons cited with the aid of the ECP were now not even taken into consideration via the single bench,” the legal professional argued.

The extra lawyer standard (AAG) apprised the court that “there are some facts that had been not taken into consideration with the aid of the single bench”.

The court inquired if the ECP may be “ordered” and “what might have passed off if the courtroom had honestly declared the ECP’s decision illegal”.

“The ECP is free to take choices independently,” the DG law said.

Upon the CJ’s inquiry, the DG law apprised the court docket that if elections have been delayed for any motive, a new date needed to be introduced by the ECP and that clean elections can be called within a hundred and twenty days if the range of union councils was accelerated.

Later, the IHC reserved its decision on the ECP and the federal government’s appeals against the order to maintain LG elections in the federal capital and issued notices to parties on appeals associated with Islamabad LG elections.

The notices were issued to the respondents, such as PTI chief Ali Nawaz Awan and Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) chief Mian Aslam, summoning them on Jan 9.

error: Content is protected !!